Portals and Butterflies

This is a math island, but the math here is simple and speaks for itself, because ultimately, it is the inelegant that is vulnerable to reality.

As unsolved as many problems are, we are also sitting on a number of solved problems that have yet to be tied cohesively. It's in the tying that a new dimension is unlocked.

The research I am doing in this island is ongoing.

There are parts that go beyond the minuscule and, in fact, reach into every domain of life. I will cover some of them below.

The rotation of nature

I would call this is an accumulation-free turnover of a system that remains integrated at every moment in time. The math shows this beautifully.

First, $e^x$ is special because its derivative is itself; it is growth through self-propagating change. But Euler’s formula adds $i$ to the mix, and if we take the derivative of this formula, we can see that change is turned, phase by phase, until it returns, and keeps cycling like that.

\begin{gathered} e^{ix} = \cos x + i \sin x \\[8pt] z = e^{ix} \longrightarrow z’ = iz \end{gathered}

If we assume unitary transformation, then from our dissection of time, we can see that this is dictated by $e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}\hat{H}t}$ , which is structurally similar to $e^{i\theta}$ . And this, when applied to a closed quantum system, preserves the total probability while continuously evolving the relative phases of the components.

Applied to a composition energy eigenstates:

\begin{gathered} |\Psi(t)\rangle = e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}\hat{H}t} \sum_n c_n|E_n\rangle = \sum_n c_n e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}E_nt}|E_n\rangle \\[8pt] \frac{ c_m e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}E_mt} }{ c_n e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}E_nt} } = \frac{c_m}{c_n} e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}(E_m-E_n)t} \end{gathered}

Applied to a pure superposition:

\begin{gathered} H = \frac{\hbar\omega}{2}\sigma_z = \frac{\hbar\omega}{2} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0\\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix} \\[8pt] U(t) = e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}Ht} = \begin{pmatrix} e^{-i\omega t/2} & 0\\ 0 & e^{+i\omega t/2} \end{pmatrix} \\[8pt] |\Psi(0)\rangle = \alpha|0\rangle+\beta|1\rangle = \begin{pmatrix} \alpha\\ \beta \end{pmatrix} \\[8pt] |\Psi(t)\rangle = U(t)|\Psi(0)\rangle \quad\longrightarrow\quad \alpha e^{-i\omega t/2}|0\rangle + \beta e^{+i\omega t/2}|1\rangle \\[8pt] \frac{\beta(t)}{\alpha(t)} = \frac{\beta}{\alpha}e^{i\omega t} \end{gathered}

The whole is encoded in the coherent relations among its parts, and the next move is incorporated into the present.

Forged in Fire

The Cove — interactive panoramic tour — Enter

In the cove above, it is integration $\mathcal{I}$ , not time, that turns the loop.

\begin{gathered}   U=\min(S,C),   \qquad   L=|S-C| \\[16pt]   \mathcal{I}=\frac{U}{U+L} \\[12pt] \end{gathered}

$S$ is what is available to be received; C is the capacity to receive and harness it.

$U$ is what turns through, and $L$ is what remains unmatched.

$S$ and $C$ are measured through the qualities of warmth, transformation, fluidity, continuity, movement, exchange, substance, and support. I group these into Fire, Water, Air, and Earth. These are qualities are fundamental, and in flux.

What is received in one form can return in another: Water receives the Sun’s warmth, Fire, and rises as vapour, carrying that warmth into the Air. Condensation releases the warmth; rain returns Water to Earth. What one receives becomes what another can receive, and the loop turns.

If:

\begin{gathered}   S=C>0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \mathcal{I}=1 \end{gathered}

... then what is received can be transformed and offered again in the next cycle. Complete, present-tense integration.

For simplicity, we can maintain the same relationship regardless of scale:

\mathcal{I} = \frac{\sum_j U_j} {\sum_j U_j + \sum_j L_j}

Finding time

Where does time actually from? How fundamental is it, really?

Take the time-dependent Schrödinger:

i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}|\Psi(t)\rangle = \hat H|\Psi(t)\rangle

It is $\hat H$ that generates change that time simply indexes, and when fixed, allows us to arrive at something that transforms an entire closed quantum system.

\begin{gathered} |\Psi(t)\rangle = U(t)|\Psi(0)\rangle \\[12pt] i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}|\Psi(t)\rangle = \hat H|\Psi(t)\rangle \quad \longrightarrow \quad U(t) = e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}\hat{H}t} \\[12pt] |\Psi(t)\rangle = e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}\hat{H}t}|\Psi(0)\rangle \\[12pt] \end{gathered}

More generally, we can say that a generator $\hat G$ produces a transformation through its exponential:

\begin{gathered} U(s)=e^{-is\hat{G}/\hbar} \end{gathered}

Time of energy

Now, there is a striking asymmetry. Momentum $\hat{p}$ is an observable and generates shifts of another observable, position $\hat{x}$ .

\begin{gathered} [\hat{x},\hat{p}] = i\hbar \\[8pt] \hat{x} \rightarrow \hat{x}+a \end{gathered}

If we assume that time and energy work identically, then:

\begin{gathered} V^\dagger \hat{H}V = \hat{H}-\varepsilon I \quad\forall\varepsilon\in\mathbb R \end{gathered}

\begin{gathered} \hat T=\hat T^\dagger,\qquad V(\varepsilon)=e^{-i\varepsilon\hat T/\hbar} \\[8pt] [\hat{T},\hat{H}] = \hat{T}\hat{H}-\hat{H}\hat{T} = i\hbar I \\[8pt] \frac{d}{d\varepsilon}\left(V^\dagger \hat{H}V\right) = \frac{i}{\hbar}V^\dagger[\hat{T},\hat{H}]V = -I \\[8pt] V(0)=I \\[8pt] V^\dagger \hat{H}V = \hat{H}-\varepsilon I \end{gathered}

But then $\hat{T}$ would generate arbitrary shifts in energy, including energies below the ground state. That cannot happen if energy has a lower bound.

\begin{gathered} E_{\min} \le \langle \psi | V(\varepsilon)^\dagger \hat{H} V(\varepsilon) | \psi \rangle = E - \varepsilon < E_{\min} \end{gathered}

\begin{gathered} \langle\psi|\psi\rangle=1,\qquad E=\langle\psi|\hat H|\psi\rangle \\[8pt] \end{gathered}

This asymmetry shows that no self-adjoint time operator generating unrestricted unitary energy translations can coexist with a bounded-below Hamiltonian.

Circle town

Still, we don't know where time comes from. $i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}|\Psi(t)\rangle = \hat H|\Psi(t)\rangle$ presupposes $t$ .

Perhaps then, time is not an independent substance, but a relationship between changes. So instead of saying $A = A(t)$ , one ultimately wants something more like:

\begin{gathered} A = A(C) \\[8pt] C=(n,\phi),\qquad A=A(n,\phi) \end{gathered}

Here, $C$ is some other physical process serving as a clock, $n$ records which cycle, and $\phi$ records where within that cycle (phase).

Making space

I can't think of a plainer way to say this other than: space is not what we think it is. I mean space in its totality, from the space between thoughts, to the space between planets.

Compress and record

Our discovery of relational time in Circle town, with $A = A(C)$ , moves us to the beginning of compression territory. A tip of one iceberg.

Suppose there are $N$ distinguishable cycle counts and $M$ distinguishable phases within a cycle:

\begin{gathered} B_{\text{count}} = \left\lceil \log_2 N \right\rceil \\[10pt] B_{\text{reading}} \geq \left\lceil \log_2(NM) \right\rceil \end{gathered}

Because of the structure of C, we can reliably distinguish [time] readings, distributed over an even range and resolution, and we can do this with relatively and exponentially less information (space) than the sheer number of possible distinguishable positions.

Gastronomy blackhole

In the The Gut Universe I mention that food becomes local the moment it enter my gut. What I was trying to say there was: a local system can bring together contributions from widely separated histories without preserving those histories as a widely separated arrangement. Put another way, the physical distance between things need not be all that relevant when it enters a local vortex of sorts. One may call the gut a blackhole of gastronomy.

The pure and relative Whole

There is something only present in the Whole and cannot be grasped merely by part, and I see parallels of this across life. Below is yet another parallel, but perhaps the most fundamental of them all.

Relational structure among alternatives within the system (coherence) can, depending on the basis, be harnessed to produce outcomes of varying certainty (interference). And there is a geometric reason that certainty too is basis dependent. More on this later.

Zoom out out of the single particle and you'll find relational structure among subsystems with a larger whole ~ entanglement.

Consider the pure entangled state with environmental overlap $\gamma$ :

\begin{gathered} |\Psi\rangle=\alpha |A\rangle |E_A\rangle+\beta |B\rangle |E_B\rangle,\qquad|\alpha|^2+|\beta|^2=1 \\[8pt] \gamma=\langle E_B|E_A\rangle \end{gathered}

Define the path predictability (certainty) $\mathcal P$ , the local coherence $\mathcal C$ in the path basis, and the system-environment entanglement $\mathcal E$ :

\begin{gathered} \mathcal P = \left| |\alpha|^2-|\beta|^2 \right| \\[8pt] \mathcal C = 2|\alpha\beta|\,|\gamma| \\[8pt] E = 2|\alpha\beta| \sqrt{1-|\gamma|^2} \end{gathered}

This satisfies:

\begin{gathered} \mathcal P^2+\mathcal C^2+\mathcal E^2=1 \end{gathered}

\begin{gathered} \mathcal P^2 = \left(|\alpha|^2-|\beta|^2\right)^2 \quad\longrightarrow\quad 4|\alpha\beta|^2 = 1-\mathcal P^2 \\[8pt] \mathcal C^2+\mathcal E^2 = 4|\alpha\beta|^2 \left( |\gamma|^2+1-|\gamma|^2 \right) = 4|\alpha\beta|^2 = 1-\mathcal P^2 \end{gathered}

For an equal superposition:

\begin{gathered} |\alpha|=|\beta|=\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}, \quad \mathcal P=0 \\[16pt] \therefore\quad{ \mathcal C^2+\mathcal E^2=1 } \end{gathered}

\quad\mathcal C=|\gamma|, \qquad \mathcal E=\sqrt{1-|\gamma|^2} \\[12pt]

If the environment cannot distinguish the paths, the particle retains its local coherence:

\begin{gathered} |\gamma|=1 \\[8pt] \therefore\quad\mathcal C=1, \qquad \mathcal E=0 \end{gathered}

If the environment perfectly distinguishes the paths, coherence is delocalized:

\begin{gathered} |\gamma|=0 \\[8pt] \therefore\quad\mathcal C=0, \qquad \mathcal E=1 \end{gathered}

This is an entangled state. Each particle alone contains less information than the pair contains together. Specifically, no particle holds the coherence terms that contain information about the phase that belongs to and compares two branches of the entangled state.

\begin{gathered} |\Phi^{\pm}\rangle = \frac{|00\rangle \pm |11\rangle}{\sqrt{2}} \\[12pt] |\Phi^{+}\rangle \neq |\Phi^{-}\rangle \\[12pt] \rho_A^{\pm} = \rho_B^{\pm} = \frac{I}{2} = \frac12 \left( |0\rangle\langle0| + |1\rangle\langle1| \right) \\[16pt] \left\{ |00\rangle\langle11|, \; |11\rangle\langle00| \right\} \subset \operatorname{terms}\!\left(\rho_{AB}^{\pm}\right) \\[12pt] \langle00|\rho_{AB}^{\pm}|11\rangle = \pm\frac12 \neq 0 ,\quad \langle11|\rho_{AB}^{\pm}|00\rangle = \pm\frac12 \neq 0 \end{gathered}

The entangled state is pure while each part is mixed, and it also cannot be factorized.

\begin{gathered} S(\rho_{AB})=0 \\[8pt] S(\rho_A)>0, \qquad S(\rho_B)>0 \\[8pt] |\Psi\rangle_{AB} \neq |\psi\rangle_A \otimes |\epsilon\rangle_B \end{gathered}

This is how we connect purity, coherence, certainty, and entanglement.

And I mentioned earlier that there is a geometric reason that certainty changes with the basis. A measurement basis is a particular physical question being asked of the state. I will close the loop on this.

For a pure state represented by Bloch vector $\mathbf r$ , measured along axis $\mathbf n$ :

\begin{gathered} \rho = \frac{1}{2} \left( I+\mathbf r\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma} \right) \\[8pt] \Pi_{+\mathbf n} = \frac{1}{2} \left( I+\mathbf n\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma} \right) , \quad \Pi_{-\mathbf n} = \frac{1}{2} \left( I-\mathbf n\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma} \right) \\[8pt] P(\pm_{\mathbf n}) = \operatorname{Tr} \left( \rho\Pi_{\pm\mathbf n} \right) = \frac{1}{4} \operatorname{Tr} \left[ \left( I+\mathbf r\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma} \right) \left( I\pm\mathbf n\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma} \right) \right] \\[8pt] \operatorname{Tr}(I)=2, \qquad \operatorname{Tr}(\sigma_i)=0, \qquad \operatorname{Tr}(\sigma_i\sigma_j)=2\delta_{ij} \\[12pt] P(+_{\mathbf n}) = \frac{1+\mathbf r\cdot\mathbf n}{2}, \qquad P(-_{\mathbf n}) = \frac{1-\mathbf r\cdot\mathbf n}{2} \end{gathered}

\begin{gathered} \text{Three perpendicular axes of the Bloch sphere} \\[8pt] Z\text{-axis} \longleftrightarrow |0\rangle,\ |1\rangle \\[8pt] X\text{-axis} \longleftrightarrow |+_x\rangle,\ |-_x\rangle \\[8pt] Y\text{-axis} \longleftrightarrow |+_y\rangle,\ |-_y\rangle \end{gathered}

Therefore, if the state is pure, then we can know ... that the degree of alignment between $\mathbf r$ and $\mathbf n$ directly informs the certainty of measurement outcomes.

\begin{gathered} \mathbf r=\mathbf n \quad\Longrightarrow\quad P(+_{\mathbf n})=1 \\[8pt] \mathbf r=-\mathbf n \quad\Longrightarrow\quad P(-_{\mathbf n})=1 \\[8pt] \mathbf r\cdot\mathbf n=0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad P(+_{\mathbf n}) = P(-_{\mathbf n}) = \frac12 \end{gathered}

Purity belongs to the state, while certainty belongs to the relation between the state and the way it is met.